Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-9531161-20140217041620/@comment-5394692-20140217044741

Randomouscrap98 wrote: Changes involving demotion won't include the person being demoted, obviously. I don't care if we have to wait for Kirby, we're not waiting to do stuff, we're waiting to change what we're already doing. Like I said before, it's not going stop us from getting stuff done, it's about making sure we ALL agree. I'm serious about this. Even if it takes a week or so to come up with something new, after we come up with it, it could take a ridiculous amount of time to actually implement it anyway.

At least you cleared that. Now, how about a message to that inactive user and if the user doesn't respond within "X" time and the majority "agrees/disagrees" the decision will go on? At least add "with exceptions" or an asterisk.