Thread:Toodles78/@comment-25827645-20141208030611/@comment-25827645-20141210011120

Pixel-Voxel wrote:

KevinFoley wrote: Speak for yourself, I would happily write a set of rules to define what's not useful and I have no problem with explaining to a 12-year-old that their article is not good enough to keep :P Or, in a more acceptable fashion, you could simply tell them what to improve on in their article without the implied "your page doesn't deserve to be here because it doesn't meet my standards". Same can be said for what isn't really useful. Like... a tutorial on how to use PRINT. It's relatively self-explanatory and you'd only really need the existing page or even the manual itself for it.

I'm not sure why you'd be so eager to create rules in a community that argues over rules (the rules page itself was archived). Frequently. And if it's not being argued over, it's just being consistently broken (like the QR code rule). I've been here for what, a few days? I'm not familiar with any former administrative struggles. Any wiki community can and will argue over rules but that doesn't preclude their existence. Anyway, my last comment wasn't intended to be taken seriously. I'm not trying to force a systemic change