Talk:34 Zambezi Questionnaires/@comment-5334617-20141215050913/@comment-14600979-20141215231942

Exactly what Pixel said, without the not wanting to write about it (only because i managed to think about it enough). I have disliked the idea and it isn't as simple as "hey someone delete this because it doesn't help." I hope everyone realizes that.

This is a collaborative community where anyone can share their code, and being "good" has never been a requirement besides the basic "have a decent looking page and don't waste people's time," and even as far as the page usually someone else would fix it and it would be fine.

That said, I do think a (low) content submission quality bar may be acceptable. Having under, say, 15 lines, serving no useful (again, what does "useful" mean) purpose, or otherwise not having a positive effect on any user could be asked to moved to a non-article location. But answer me this: What about joke programs? Does Christmas Game, the barely two line INPUT then PRINT joke program, which gave us the oft used in chat "yOur'E winRe," need to be deleted? (Actually, that might be in a thread, which I'm treating as acceptable location for content that does not fit the example rule). My "SubmersiDS" April Fools Prank?

I know content control would very much improve the usefulness of this site for viewers, but the number of exceptions, explanations, and possibly angered reactions that could come from a rule, especially what people seem to be thinking of when they ask that something be deleted, need to be thought of. Going around having people pick and choose is out of the question, at least for me.