Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-9531161-20140217041620/@comment-9531161-20140217045401

The exceptions should be ridiculously scarce and only pertain to a very specific range of subjects. Most of the stuff we're changing doesn't require a fast turn-around time, but it DOES cause problems if we don't all agree. And I don't think we should bend the rules or make things too arbitrary or complicated. I know that TriforceOfKirby isn't around too often, but he shows up now and again. If he wants to vote himself out of these issues, then that's up to him. However, until we hear his take on this, I really think we should stick to "all or nothing".

This doesn't pertain to trying to fix problems that don't require a change in the way we do things. For instance, following the rules and deleting useless pages isn't something we all need to agree on, as long as you're doing it right. Fixing errors here and there that fall within our predefined guidelines doesn't count either. Resolving conflicts without changing the wiki also doesn't count. Seriously, we'll still be able to do a lot.