Thread:SquareFingers/@comment-25827645-20141212102114/@comment-25827645-20141215232927

Thanks again!

When you use phrasing such as "a more experienced programmer would choose the latter", I don't know if you are trying to suggest that I am not experienced, or just that a rookie might not know better. I don't think you meant it to be offensive, but it could read that way. I wouldn't say it's such a cut and dry situation; whether or not to consider 0.8 HP on a 1-100 scale to be alive or dead is a design decision, not a universal rule. Anyway, I had been thinking the < by itself would be easier to follow since it's a standard mathematical symbol, whereas <= and >= are slightly different than how you would write them on paper.

I had originally been writing IF X == TRUE instead of X to avoid going into too much detail and confusing the reader. I'll try to think of a good way to simplify it. I'll fix the bit on labels as well