Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-14600979-20140206012248

Is it reasonable? Is it worthwhile?

This would basically mean a mass deletion. Most all programs would survive, those that are not full pages would be cleaned, the rules would be rewritten, creating a better structure and keeping the wiki under control.

This does NOT involve creating a new wiki or moving to a new site.
 * Mass cleanup. All those near empty pages will be infobox-ified and become closer, if not standard layout.
 * Empty threads that are collecting dust will probably be deleted.
 * Admins will have limits on their actions. (Don't reject this one until you know what the limitations are, jeez.)


 * "Chat polls" Will not be accepted as reason to take any action whatsoever, except those pertaining to program decisions. This is important. (See below)
 * Any rules that are unstable or do not apply will be rewritten or removed. One example is "Enter appropriate categories that describe your program. This helps with organization so users can find your program more easily. Available categories are listed below. " (Content Submission). The categories are not listed or linked anywhere on the page.

//Chat Polls, Cont.\\

Direct quotes:

Do you see what is wrong with them? In this case, it was partly my fault (well, not really, because I did it on purpose) for not giving any detail or any information at all, really, and partly Oraclemann's, for not asking for more detail. Beyond not being accepted as a true vote, I warn people to look out for this and think more critically.

Thank you for not reading or caring. I kid. Unless you didn't read. 