Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-9531161-20140217041620/@comment-9531161-20140217182345

The first part is sort of right; the choice can be modified until everyone agrees on it.

The second part didn't get us into this mess... I think you're just still angry that you were demoted. If people overreact, then we can kick them out. It's that plain and simple... if you're not willing to get along, then you're not willing to be an admin.

I think you're misunderstanding me. I'm not saying you're not allowed to contribute, I'm saying you're not allowed to change the structure. I gave a pile of examples on this... this doesn't mean we won't be contributing anything. On the contrary, this gives you all free reign to do what you want as long as it's within the guidelines. I'm just saying that a change in the way we do things will require approval first. Otherwise please, go ahead doing whatever you think you can to make the wiki a better place.

Did you forget that most of these problems we've been having are because of people changing big things without the approval of everyone? I'll list out the examples again:
 * You making Smoked an admin without approval
 * People banning or kicking in the chat without rhyme or reason
 * Persson removing the chat cursing protection
 * Smoked adding extra stuff to the logger
 * Stuff I may have done (you can remind me if you want, I actually forgot lol)

We already have a 2/3 type of system in place... this is why I want to change it. People doing stuff that others didn't agree with have caused so many of these problems. And I absolutely won't tolerate admin misbehavior anymore, by the way. If you're not going to act responsible, you don't deserve responsibilities.